- What is a “protected
disclosure?”
- What is an “improper governmental activity?”
- What is a “whistleblower?”
- Who can be a whistleblower?
- Where can I make a protected disclosure?
- How do I choose where to make a protected disclosure?
- Will my disclosure be held in confidence?
- May I make an anonymous disclosure?
- What are the required elements of a disclosure?
- Does my disclosure have to be in writing?
- What is the deadline for making a disclosure?
- What happens after I make a disclosure?
- Who will investigate my disclosure?
- Why might my disclosure not be considered protected?
- How can I help the investigation?
- How long will the investigation take?
- Who determines if my disclosure is protected?
- Will I be informed of the outcome?
- Can I discuss this matter with friends and colleagues?
- Where can I go with questions?
CSU Executive Order 929, which sets forth procedures CSU employees
or applicants for employment in the CSU may use to make a protected
disclosure, defines a “protected disclosure” as “any
good faith communication that discloses information that may evidence
(1) an improper governmental activity or (2) any condition that
may significantly threaten the health or safety of employees or
the public if the disclosure or intention to disclose was made for
the purpose of remedying that condition.” California Government
Code Section 8547.2(d) includes in its definition any good faith
communication that “demonstrates an intention to disclose”
an improper governmental activity or a significant health or safety
condition.
TOP
CSU Executive Order 929 defines an “improper governmental
activity” as “any activity by a CSU department or employee
that is undertaken in the performance of the employee's official
duties, whether or not that action is within the scope of his or
her employment, and that (1) is in violation of any state or federal
law or regulation, including, but not limited to, corruption, malfeasance,
bribery, theft of government property, fraudulent claims, fraud,
coercion, conversion, malicious prosecution, misuse of government
property, or willful omission to perform duty, or (2) is economically
wasteful, or involves gross misconduct, incompetence, or inefficiency.
This definition mirrors the definition found in California Government
Code Section 8547.2(b).
TOP
A “whistleblower” is someone who makes a disclosure
deemed to be “protected.”
TOP
The procedures set forth in CSU Executive Order 929 to make a disclosure
are available only to CSU employees or applicants for employment
in the CSU who have completed the application process for a specific,
available position. Any member of the general public may make a
disclosure to the Bureau of State Audits.
TOP
You may make a disclosure to the: (1) CSU’s Vice Chancellor
of Human Resources, Jackie McClain, (2) the University’s Director
of University Risk Management by telephone at (657) 278-4937 or by
e-mail John Beisner jbeisner@fullerton.edu,
or (3) Bureau of State Audits by telephone at 1-800-952-5665 or
by mail at Investigations, Bureau of State Audits, 555 Capitol Mall,
Suite 300, Sacramento, CA 95814
TOP
You should report your disclosure to the office with whom you feel
most comfortable. If you would like to make a disclosure without
initially notifying anyone in the CSU, you must contact the Bureau
of State Audits.
TOP
If you make a disclosure either to the Vice Chancellor of Human
Resources or to the Director of University Risk Management under
EO 929, care will be taken to keep your identity confidential in
so far as is feasible and consistent with the law. The Bureau of
State Audits may not disclose your identity without your written
permission unless the disclosure is to a law enforcement agency
conducting a criminal investigation.
TOP
Because EO 929 does not permit anonymous disclosures, you should
contact the Bureau of State Audits if you wish to remain anonymous.
TOP
Under EO 929, the disclosure must contain:
- Your name and address, and position title or the position applied
for.
- A detailed description of the specific actions that constituted
the alleged improper governmental activity or condition that may
significantly threaten the health or safety of employees or the
public.
- The date(s) the alleged improper activities occurred or the
condition developed.
- Names of any potential witnesses.
- Documentation, if available, to support the allegations of
improper activities or threatening conditions.
- Descriptions of documents that may support the allegations.
- Your signature, the date you signed disclosure, and your sworn
statement under penalty of perjury that the disclosure is true
or believed to be true.
Any employee or applicant considering making a disclosure under
EO 929 should review Section III of the Executive
Order.
The requirements for filing a disclosure (called a “complaint”)
with the State Bureau of Audits may be found at: http://www.bsa.ca.gov/hotline/filecomp.php.
TOP
Under EO 929, disclosures to the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources
or to the University’s Director of University Risk Management
must be in writing. The Bureau of State Audits accepts verbal disclosures.
TOP
Disclosures to the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources or to the
Director of University Risk Management under EO 929 must be made
within thirty days after the event giving rise to the disclosure
or within thirty days after the employee or the applicant for employment
knew or reasonably should have known of the event. There is no specified
time limit for making a disclosure to the Bureau of State Audits.
TOP
Under EO 929, a preliminary review will likely be conducted to
determine if the requirements for a protected disclosure have been
met. In addition, you may be interviewed.
TOP
If you make your disclosure to the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources,
a representative from the Chancellor’s Office or an individual
hired by the Chancellor’s Office will review your disclosure
to determine if it is protected. If it is, and a determination is
made that an investigation is warranted, a representative from the
Chancellor’s Office or an individual hired by the Chancellor’s
Office will investigate your allegations. If you make your disclosure
to the Director of University Risk Management, a representative
from the University or an individual hired by the University will
review your disclosure to determine if it is protected. If it is,
and a determination is made that an investigation is warranted,
a representative from the University or an individual hired by the
University will investigate your allegations.
TOP
Sometimes events are reported that on their face are not improper
governmental activities or significant threats to health and safety,
but are instead personnel, labor relations or management issues.
Not all violations of CSU or University policies represent improper
governmental activities. If a determination is made that your allegations
do not qualify as a protected disclosure, those allegations may
still be reviewed and/or investigated for compliance with other
CSU or University policies and procedures.
TOP
Tell the truth. In addition, you can provide as much factual information
and evidence as possible to allow the investigation to proceed.
However, do not obtain any documents for which you do not have a
right of access and do not conduct your own investigation. You should
prepare yourself to be interviewed and to provide all information
you know about the allegations you raised.
TOP
Every investigation is unique. For those disclosures made under
EO 929, the objective is to conduct investigations in a timely manner.
TOP
If you make a disclosure to the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources,
the Vice Chancellor will determine if your allegations are protected.
If you make a disclosure to the Director of University Risk Management,
the University President or designee will determine if your allegations
are protected.
TOP
If you make a disclosure either to the Vice Chancellor of Human
Resources or to the Director of University Risk Management, in most
cases you will receive a response to your disclosure within ninety
working days of receipt of your disclosure. Any employee or applicant
for employment who makes a disclosure under EO 929 should review
Section IV of the Executive
Order. If you make a report to the Bureau of State Audits, the
Bureau does not report back to individuals who make a complaint.
However, if the Bureau investigates and substantiates the allegations,
it in most instances issues a public report of its investigations.
TOP
To protect your confidentiality and the confidentiality of the
investigation, it is advisable not to discuss the matter with friends
or colleagues.
TOP
Contact Pat Carroll, the University’s Counsel, or John Beisner,
the University’s Director of Risk Management, with any questions
you may have concerning EO 929. Contact the Bureau of State Audits
at 1-800-952-5665 for questions concerning the California Whistleblower
Protection Act.
TOP
These responses are for informational purposes only. If there is
a conflict between these responses and the text of Executive Order
929, then the text in the Executive Order is controlling and should
be relied upon.
BACK |