|
PROCEDURE FOR ADDRESSING ALLEGATIONS OF
RETALIATION
FOR DISCLOSING IMPROPER GOVERNMENTAL ACTIVITIES OR A SIGNIFICANT
THREAT TO HEALTH OR SAFETY
CSU Executive Order 822 requires that campus presidents develop
procedures for campus managers and supervisors to accept and forward
to the Chancellor’s Office any complaints by campus employees
or applicants for employment of retaliation for making a protected
disclosure of improper governmental activities. This Directive fulfills
this requirement.
CSU Executive Order 822.
This Directive applies to all University employees and individuals
who have applied for employment at the University.
- “Retaliation” refers to the direct or indirect use
or attempted use by an employee of his or her official authority
or influence for the purpose of intimidating, threatening, coercing,
commanding, or attempting to intimidate, threaten, coerce, or
command any employee or applicant for employment for the purpose
of interfering with that person’s rights under the California
Whistleblower Protection Act, including but not limited to any
“protected disclosure” as that term is defined in
the Act and in Executive Order 822.
- “Employee” refers to a person employed by the University.
- “Applicant for employment” refers to an individual
who has completed and submitted an application for a specific,
available position at the University.
- “Use of his or her official authority or influence”
includes promising to confer, or conferring, any benefit; effecting,
or threatening to effect, any reprisal; or taking, or directing
others to take, or recommending, processing, or approving, any
personnel action, including, but not limited to, appointment,
transfer, assignment, performance evaluation, suspension, or other
disciplinary action.
- An employee or applicant for employment who believes he or she
has been retaliated against after making a protected disclosure
may file a written complaint within twelve months of the alleged
act of retaliation.
- The complaint may be filed with either the Director of University
Risk Management, Langsdorf Hall 802, or the Vice Chancellor of
Human Resources, 401 Golden Shore, Long Beach, California 90802-4210.
Filed complaints will be shared only with those individuals who
have a legitimate business reason to know.
- Supervisors or managers who receive a written complaint of retaliation
should forward it as soon as possible to the Director of University
Risk Management.
- The Director of University Risk Management will refer to the
Vice Chancellor of Human Resources all written complaints received
at the University and provide the University President with a
copy.
- If the written complaint does not include all of the following
information, it may be rejected as inadequate:
- The name and mailing address of the complainant, the complainant’s
working title, or position applied for if the complainant
was an applicant for employment.
- A detailed description of the specific actions that constituted
the alleged improper governmental activity or significant
threat to health or safety, including name(s) and title(s)
of the University employee(s) or official(s) involved.
- The name of the entity where the improper governmental
activity was reported and the date of the disclosure. A copy
of the report should be attached to the complaint.
- A description of the specific actions taken that constituted
the alleged retaliation, including the date or dates of such
actions, and the names and titles of the University officials
who allegedly took the retaliatory actions, and an explanation
of the reasons why those actions were in retaliation for making
a protected disclosure.
- A signed and dated statement under penalty of perjury that
the contents of the complaint are true or are believed to
be true.
- The Vice Chancellor of Human Resources or his/her designee
will send a written acknowledgement within ten 10 days of receiving
the complaint.
- Executive Order 822 contains a sample complaint form and sets
forth in detail how the Vice Chancellor of Human Resources will
respond to a complaint of retaliation.
BACK |